Canon EF 70300mm f/45.6 IS USM Lens for
| Brand: | Canon | ||
| Average Rating |
|
There is a lot of Digital Photography Guide which offers various camera lenses information of different types and brands just like Canon EF 70-300mm. In introduction of Canon EF 70-300mm, the most popular camera lens of Canon has been replaced, as well as its pioneer image stabilized lens. The Canon EF 70 300mm USM is very popular due to its useful focal length range, lightweight, small size, midrange price as well as its image stabilization feature.
With its 3rd generation image stabilizer, the Canon EF 70-300mm is designed to be flexible. It is made to be handheld at a shutter speed of up to 3 f-stops which is slower than the non-stabilized lens which has the same focal length. According to Canon, there are gyro sensors which detect unnecessary vibrations. This triggers the corresponding movement of correcting lens group which is perpendicular to the optical axis. This, then, alters the light path, which returns the image to its proper place on the film plane or sensor.
In using the 1/ focal length rule, Canon EF 70 300mm USM could be handheld at 300mm with 1/45 of a second shutter speed. There could be sharp handheld images that are consistently at 1/5 or 1/4 second shutter speeds at 70 mm, and at 1/25 second at 300 mm on a whole frame body.
The automatic tripod sensing will prevent feedback loops that usually occur between the image stabilizer sensors as well as stabilizer motor vibrations. This application if image stabilizer comprises of Modes 1 and 2 stabilizations. Use the mode 1 which is dual axis stabilization in shooting stationary subjects, while use the mode 2 for a single axis stabilization in panning on a moving subject. The image stabilization switches are recessed to avoid accidental changes, which is a nice improvement. People have said over and over again that image stabilization is the most wonderful feature of this camera lens. It is a great help especially when shooting stationary subjects without the use of tripod.
Generally, image stabilization is very helpful especially for a slow and lens with narrow aperture. But of course, slow is relative. The Canon EF 70-300mm apertures are typical for the consumer telephoto zoom lens. more info
The Lens is great and very easy to use
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
My Husband and I purchased the lens to go to Mexico and it worked wonderful. We ended up taking almost 1000 pictures and look forward to taking pictures of my son playing baseball.
nice upgrade
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
This is a great upgrade lens from any kit lens; the optical quality is quite good, and the IS helps. When using the IS, remember to keep the shutter half-way pushed for about a second before shooting, which allows the IS to kick in.
On my 40D, I felt this lens was a bit tight due to the crop factor. I picked up a 5D (original version) and the lens came to life. I really like the combination and have decided to put off getting a 70-200L for a while. This will do just fine. I just have to decide what wide angle zoom to get, now (probably the 17-40L).
My gripes with this lens are minimal; the lens does extend when it zooms; the rotating focus element is not a problem for me. Sometimes I forget to change the lens settings on the lens (mode 1 or 2, AF on or off). It’s just something I have to learn.
Read many comparisons with 70-200 f/4L
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I read nearly every review and discussion about the Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM lens, especially as compared with the Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, and finally bought the 70-300 yesterday for my new Rebel T2i (550D). Particular concerns others have had were sharpness vs. the L, non-ring USM, and the extending, rotating lens barrel.
So far I’m quite satisfied. Shooting at f/8 I’ve gotten some very nice test shots, including fast AF lock and good sharpness at 300mm on a flying seagull (which fills my computer monitor width at 100%).
Sharpness at 200mm and 300mm seem about the same, but I like the extra reach of 300mm, either to fill the frame or to downsample for more sharpness. I think the biggest variable in the sharpness of my test photos is what part of the scene I lock focus on (as in a landscape with a lot of depth); I’d conclude from my best shots that the lens itself is quite sharp. I’m still learning the camera and lens.
The extending, rotating lens barrel seems minor vs. the much greater cost, less reach, and greater size of the L lens. While shooting seagulls the AF didn’t lock on plain blue sky and went blurry, so I quickly refocused on a building before looking for the next bird.
I found sample images most useful to me, so I posted some of mine so far at [...] (Google my name with Canon 70-300).
rhender259
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I bought this as a Christmas present for my wife who is an amateur photographer. She loves it. She’s impressed with the portrait capability, color and clarity for the price. Since she’s happy, I’m happy.
Great choice for a Telephoto/Zoom
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I debated for a long time between purchasing this lens versus the more expensive L-series. I know that I made the right choice after using this lens for about 2 months. It has given me tack sharp images up to approx. the 275mm focal length but softens slightly at full length. It is easy to mount, moderate weight and has excellent 2 mode IS capability. Sample shots are posted.
Excellent lens for the price
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
Before buying this lens, I spent quite a bit of time debating between this lens and Canon 70-200 f4 L lens. The positive reviews and the IS feature of this lens swung my decision in favor of this lens. I have had this lens for about six months and I am extremely pleased with it. I am sure people will say that the 70-200 f4 L lens blows this lens out in various ways. But for some one who has a fixed budget and for whom photography is just a hobby not a profession the value that his lens presents is hard to beat. I simply couldn’t justify spending $500 more to get the 70-200 f4 IS lens.
The optical quality of this lens is really good. The pictures are sharp, with beautiful colors and contrast. This lens gives a very pleasing bokeh. Take a look at image 334 of customer images ( African Daisy) to see what I mean. I haven’t extensively tested the speed of Auto Focus, but from whatever little testing I did on flying birds I was satisfied by its performance. And finally the IS feature on this lens works really great.
Great lens
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I’ve been using this lens for a week and love it. I’ve taken some great pictures of my twin boys and some great photos of sunsets from my backyard. I uploaded three photos to flickr to show some samples. My flickr name is bfmersereau and the photos were uploaded on January 4th, 2010. I’m your average photographer and I’m using a Canon T1i. I highly recommend this lens.
Great lens
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I really do enjoy this lens! It takes honestly sharp pictures , even at night in the parking lot from a building far away it! Only gripe I have is wow this lens is very long, and I might return it only because of that only that. Other than if that doesn’t concern you (if your considering purchasing this look at the specs with a measuring tape, then do it again with it zoomed out and see if your comfortable with that) I just can’t
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens for Canon EOS SLR Cameras from Amazon
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I am enjoying the new telephoto lens. It does a great job: I love it.
Great lens for the price
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I bought Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens before went to Winter Olympics in Vancouver, I am so glad I did, the quality of the lens is very good for the price, got some great photos from short track speed skating including Apolo’s close up shots.
[...].
I like this lens
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
I have owned the 70-200 L lens and now I purchased the 70-300 IS. I like the 70-300 IS better and the pictures have been better. Actually I was disappointed when I bought the 70-200L but have not been disappointed with the 70-300 IS. I also owned the 70-300 non IS and would not recommend that one at all.I took pictures when it had rained all day and heavy overcast and the pictures were awesome. I would recommend this lens to anybody that’s not professional but wants some nice pics that are close to professional.
Very nice for the price.
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
This lens works very nicely as advertised. Do not expect the quality to be that of an “L” lens but, when needing a good telephoto lens, this lens will get the job done with tack-sharp results.
Terrific lens for the cost
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
I use this lens when I don’t want to travel with a heavier/more valuable one. Given its range and the image quality for the cost, I highly recommend it.
Great lens for price
Rating:4 out of 5 stars
Got this to shoot elephant seals on central California coast. Very sharp lens. Construction feels solid. Front of lens rotates during focus which means can’t use polarizer during action shots. Wish lens was faster, but that would make it much more expensive.
A good telephoto lens: pros and cons
Rating:5 out of 5 stars
This lens is very useful for different purposes. Not only as a zoom-in lens that allows you to approach distant subjects but also I find it suitable for portrait photography. In fact, you can say this is a non-intrusive lens -so to speak, when it comes to taking face close-ups. With other lower focal distance lenses I have noticed that people, and especially children, get bored or uncomfortable. Besides, it’s extremely easy to achieve a significant “bokeh” (diffused background) given the amplification factor that a large focal distance produces. Taking portrait pictures at 300mm the background starts to get out of focus just a few feet behind your subject. The role of aperture is not key anymore because depth of field (DOF) isn’t what matters most. The IS works great and the sound it makes isn’t too noisy. I have achieved very sharp images even in middle or low light conditions, thanks to this feature. Now the flip side! This lens is heavy and too large for transportation. Definitively it’s not a good choice for traveling or if you are concerned for your safety. The lens is expensive and easily catches people’s attention. If you hold it for some time in your hands while it is attached to the camera body, you start feeling tiredness. Due to the weight and size the gravity balance point of the camera shifts from to body to some point along the lens so I tend to grab hold of the latter instead of the camera body, as usually happens with any other lens. When it comes to focusing, the process is a bit slow though I think it’s a normal behavior. Under low light conditions (for example, bulb lights) the lens might find it difficult to get a subject into focus. If that happens the focusing barrel goes back and forward till it gets something into focus. Over all: good lens!!!